Seems Mr. Trump wishes to beg the point in regard as to where a number of different lines should be drawn. I can’t answer all those questions especially in light of AI, but I can say Congress has been extraordinarily irresponsible in protecting privacy online.
I can’t say either where exactly to draw the line in regard to living satire especially because as a journalist I see the dangers of censorship and already escalating attacks on the first amendment, of which I am currently experiencing.
The concept of “spirited away” is often taken out of context, or simply used to obsfucate acts of terrorism. In any case overt acts of violence are not cases of “spirited away.”
Holy fuck beating 10 year old kids is based on physical violence and should never be tolerated much less be used to gaslight the victims. You know you’re dealing with extreme moral turpitude when “rape the rape victim” is the prevailing protocol.
Likewise, the physical violence projected by the system of terrorist cells on Wheeler Ave is categorically unacceptable particularly because it’s intention is the propagation of constitutionally subversive propaganda, as well as censorship and 1st amendment dissolution.
Etc. Everyone needs empathy and benefits from life experiences. However, 1st amendment rights are not, and should not be, contingent upon “club” “membership” nor should cults be allowed to inductively enforce their protocols, much less as part of a well-connected and subversive agenda.
An independent voice in the wilderness provides a reality check to those media outlets, and others, who may be blind to their own interconnected bias. However, the lone wolf also has to put food in his mouth, pay bills and benefit from healthy social interactions, and a conducive work environment.
Discretionary grants from sources such as the Bill and what’s her name Foundation could have appropriately achieved this positive arrangement.
(The Onion ain’t what I call satire, it’s more like French sarcasm to me.)
©2025 – Jim Porter Casey
Addendum: Just because it’s being suggested doesn’t mean it’s not a good idea since there are, theoretically, plenty of discretionary options. Unless the options are all bad, which then would be plenty bad if not good. Which would then be very, very bad.
Cc: Deputy Smartass
Ps: I’m not Catholic
