Biden Paybacks Be Crazy

Biden Puts The Chains on Ryan!


Talk about media bias. If you are not aware, I generally watch CBS for news and political information. Not that I always agree with them, I don’t. But I really couldn’t abide a steady dose of an onion breath radish like Martha Radditz – yuck!

The bias of which I speak, is CBS. It seems to me that when Romney was rude and obnoxious to Obama, they referred to him as “presidential.” The public opinion polls did agree, but I felt like Romney’s attempt to aggressively dominate was not presidential at all, and was more aptly recognized as the tactics of a bully.

And yet, immediately after the vice presidential debate, where Joe Biden frankly skewered Paul Ryan, the CBS pundits weighed in saying things like Biden had put down Ryan, constantly interrupted, treated him like a “boy,” put him in his place, and that Biden was “unglued.”

Scott Pelly made an interesting remark saying that Joe Biden sometimes says things he ends up regretting. Maybe, but I’ve never heard Biden say that. He always says that he meant what he said. I don’t understand why honest candor is somehow taboo in a political campaign. I always understand what Biden means, and whether or not I agree, respect him for being a straight shooter. They all should be straight shooters.

I didn’t see much difference in Biden’s tactics as compared to Romney, and yet the pundits had a decidedly different, even scathing review, a clear double standard, for critiquing Biden. Interestingly enough, the public didn’t follow the media bias and agreed that Biden easily won the debate.

The bias is interesting unto itself. Usually, one thinks of media bias as liberal and feminist. Neither seems to exactly apply in this case. (Then again, maybe it does.) However, a point I find regrettable and even foreboding, the bias more likely seems to be against the blackness of Obama, since Obama is actually just a black carbon copy of Romney, now that Romney has flippy flopped and morphed into his own, original, self-image. It is interesting to note, though, that in spit of the freckles on his chinny chin, Les Moonves definitely does seem to display a fondness for the blond female monkeys.

There really is no difference in who you vote for – other than the color of their skin. I’d enjoy drinking beer with Obama more… Not a good reason either – that’s why I’m running for president and absolutely would not vote for either one – based on politics alone.

There were some other differences, and consistencies, in the two debates. If Biden was too mockish of Romney the bully, he did have the information, facts, and details that neither Romney or Ryan seem capable of presenting. I can’t understand voting for a double minded double standard debate team.

There’s something wrong about boiling a campaign for president down to skin color. It’s a deflection that is drawing attention away from the real issues. They are acting hand-in-glove and setting the stage for additional, unconstitutional, constraints on individual liberty, freedom, and justice.

The real zebra striped elephant in the room is the ACA, and the still impending compulsory imposition of unethical and immoral genomic engineering. The stage has only been partially set, because of the declining economy and the expense of retiring baby boomers. Once that dust clears, and the larger economy begins to settle into a more balanced demographic, the unconstitutional skeletal infrastructure of the ACA will be ready for the burial trenches. Inverted metaphor intended.

It is ironic. The legacy of the “greatest generation,” who saved the world from the genocidal tirade of Adolph Hitler, who came home to giddy-up and breed like rabbits, left behind the collapsing weight of the retiring baby boomers thereby providing a smoke screen for the genocidal tirade of genomic engineering.

It’s about the constitution.

_____________________
© 2012 – Jim Casey
www.tocc.tv Red HOT Uploads
rssrss mailFacebooktwittermailFacebooktwitter
Nearby Links
  
Responsive Menu Image